Interview in the Austin Chronicle, Oct. 1997, with Marc Savlov:
AC:
The new film, Breaking Up, is essentially a two-person dialogue. Did
that pose any problems for you seeing as how it's not what you're
usually doing?
RC: Well, what I've tried to do since being invited to make movies
in America is not just take safer large studio and budget options.
I've done some of those but I've also done, like, multiple co-production
things with French, English, Spanish money -- things like that. I've
tried to make smaller films, as well as the larger ones, because I'd
like to look at the American film industry from many different levels
and not just from the big one.
Breaking Up had a small budget and it was a very complex script in
terms of what it asked from performance. Mainly, it was a series of
really late nights -- just trying to cram those lines into my brain,
you know? Because of that low budget there was no real rehearsal period.
It was like "here's the script" and you're off. At the time
we made it I was coming off Virtuosity with Denzel Washington, which
was a very strange filmmaking experience in itself because of all
the blue-screen work involved. I mean, you're in this blank room grabbing
stuff out of the air that doesn't exist, and then three or four months
later you've got a rose in your hand or you're playing the piano or
something like that.
So Breaking Up was about getting down and doing something a little
bit more basic and real and performer-aligned. It was a really fast
shoot, something like 28 days, really intense. Part of the shoot was
in New York City, and we were there at the same time as the Pope and
the chess championship and the president, you know? I mean, there's
bad enough traffic as it is, but when you bring all those clowns in...
it was pretty rough.
Day to day, just working on it, was pretty challenging to try and
tell that type of a story, which is really uncomfortable subject matter
for most people anyway. Trying to stay true to the reality of those
characters, you know, because they're both in their own ways sort
of charmless people, copping out by taking a secondary option, right?
They've met the person who is the passion of their life, but it's
kind of too difficult. Trying to find the core of that love so that
the people in the audience, when they see the movie, can say that
"even though I might not necessarily like this guy, I know absolutely
that he's really in love with this woman," and for all that character's
faults, he can be forgiven because of that essential fact, that love.
It was funny playing that character, because to me -- and Robert
[Greenwald, the director] doesn't really like it when I say this --
I just saw him as such a dick, you know? To me, he just doesn't have
a handle on the things that are important in life. So it's interesting
playing a character like that.
---------------------------------

Rough Cut Q & As
LA Confidential’s Russell Crowe gets scruffy, gruff and scatty.
- Published September 18, 1997
I’m really overcritical about things, so you can’t take
all things to heart. Breaking Up was a pretty good experience. Salma
Hayek is going to get the respect she deserves when they see the footage
from this film. People kind of see her as the Latin lover of the moment,
but she’s one of those woman who’s intelligence matches
her ambition. She actually does in that film one of my favorite lines
in the cinema. The scene is like, the two characters haven’t
seen each other in a while and we’ve kind of (his voice gets
hushed and sexy) - - out of lust - - gotten back together again. We’ve
spent the evening together and is halfway through the night and I’m
feeling kind of suffocated. I’m creeping out of the apartment,
putting on my cloths in the dark when she wakes up and now I’ve
got to explain…..and the explanation doesn’t go very well.
So, she starts on this tirade and finishes with, “Just for once
in my life I would like to get laid and have a good night’s
sleep.”